<\/p>\n
Bill allows for one-year incarceration of new asylum seekers, subjects all asylum seekers to forced relocation to \u2018open\u2019 detention center in the Negev. Ministerial Committee to begin discussions on tomorrow.<\/em><\/p>\n <\/p>\n This morning (November 17) the government approved a new amendment to the Law to Prevent Infiltration despite strong opposition from human rights organizations that allege the new amendment is even more draconian than the one overturned by the High Court of Justice on September 16<\/a>. The Ministerial Committee will discuss the bill tomorrow, with plans to bring it to the plenary for a first reading sometime next week.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n The government is moving with extraordinary swiftness to pass the bill before the expiration of the 90-day period set by the Court by which asylum seekers detained under the overturned amendment must be released.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n On Friday, following an unsuccessful attempt to delay the government\u2019s consideration of the bill, the Association for Civil Rights in Israel (ACRI), The Hotline for Migrant Workers, and the Aid Organization for Refugees and Asylum Seekers in Israel (ASSAF)<\/strong> sent a letter to Deputy Attorney General Dina Zilber and Legal Advisor to the Population and Immigration Authority Daniel Solomon citing their objections to the amendment.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n In the letter, Attorney Oded Feller, <\/strong>Director of the Citizenship and Residency Program at ACRI, criticized the government\u2019s procedure, alleging that it set \u201can unreasonable and illegal timetable for the bill\u201d that made it almost impossible for the organizations to react to the amendment\u2019s provisions.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Regarding the bill\u2019s provisions, Feller wrote that contrary to the state\u2019s claim, the proposal to imprison asylum seekers for one year does not comport to the High Court of Justice decision: \u201cThe nine justices on the panel reasoned that the provision is illegal because of it violates the right to freedom. Imprisonment under these circumstances, whether for one year or three, is prohibited.\u201d<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Regarding the openness of the proposed \u201copen detention center\u201d \u2013 the letter argues that it is in fact a prison.<\/strong><\/p>\n <\/p>\n \u201cThis is a prison that will jail asylum seekers who cannot be deported from Israel indefinitely and without judicial oversight. Detainees will be required to assemble three times a day in order to be counted, which, given the great distances between the prison and the nearest population centers, means that there is nowhere for the detainees to go.\u201d<\/p>\n <\/p>\n \u201cIt is a prison in the sense that it will be managed by he Prisons Authority, whose only expertise is managing prisons. It is a prison in the sense that the detainees are not allowed to work elsewhere. It is a prison that is intended to break the spirit of asylum seekers by forcing them to agree to go wherever they are told. And for whose good is all this being done? For those the High Court declared cannot be imprisoned and ordered released immediately.\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n <\/p>\n Rather than meeting the needs of the 53,000 asylum seekers currently living in Israel or addressing the hardships of the residents of south Tel Aviv, the amendment offers an answer to the nonexistent problem of new asylum seekers entering Israel. \u201cThe objective of this legislation is the continued imprisonment of people the Court ordered be released immediately, plus another 2000 asylum seekers who will be chosen arbitrarily.\u201d<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Related Materials<\/span><\/p>\n Click\u00a0here<\/a>\u00a0to read a summary of the ruling against the original amendment (in English).<\/p>\n Click\u00a0here<\/a>\u00a0to read key excerpts from the original petition.<\/p>\n Click\u00a0here<\/a>\u00a0for further information on the law and background of the original petition<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Bill allows for one-year incarceration of new asylum seekers, subjects all asylum seekers to forced relocation to \u2018open\u2019 detention … Read more